Falling in love with Gene Kelly is just so hard to do (… not).

Joe: “We’re trying to tell a story with music, and song, and dance. Well, not just with words. For instance, if the boy tells the girl that he loves her, he just doesn’t say it, he sings it.”
Jane: “Why doesn’t he just say it?”
Joe: “Why? Oh, I don’t know, but it’s kind of nice.”

Jane Falbury (Judy Garland), part of a long and proud lineage of Falbury farmers, struggles to make ends meet: the farm is not doing as well as in years past, and her farmhands have decided to leave for better-paying jobs. One day, her aspiring actress sister, Abigail (Gloria De Haven) comes home with a full theater troupe in tow. Abigail has promised her beau, Joe Ross (Gene Kelly), the director of the group, that they could use the barn to rehearse and stage their new musical production. Despite Jane’s better judgment–and the objections of her housekeeper, Esme (Marjorie Main), her longtime fiance Orville (Eddie Bracken), and his overbearing father (Ray Collins)–she allows them to stay, provided the members of the troupe help out around the farm.

In the wake of a disastrous barn dance overrun by the theater troupe–and after Joe’s buddy, bumbling Herb Blake (Phil Silvers), inadvertently destroys Jane’s new tractor–she decides to order the group away. But Jane is touched when the actors pool their meager funds and Joe sells his station wagon to buy her a new tractor. She again agrees to let them stay, and gradually finds herself falling in love with Joe, even though he has an understanding with Abigail, and she remains reluctantly engaged to Orville. But when Abigail develops a diva-like attitude and runs off to Broadway with the musical’s star (Hans Conried), Jane is thrust into the starring role opposite Joe, and the two of them can no longer deny their feelings as the show goes on …

Summer Stock (1950) was a notoriously difficult and troubled production, but as a product of the MGM musical dream factory, naturally none of this turmoil showed onscreen. As filming commenced, Judy Garland had just left rehab (which she had entered in an effort to quell her drug addiction), and was still considered something of a risk–with good reason, as her erratic behavior and habitual lateness had previously cost her roles in films such as The Barkleys of Broadway (1949) and Annie Get Your Gun (1950). The shoot eventually ran overlong (a total of six months). The movie marked her final film for longtime home studio MGM; she was fired from Royal Wedding (1951) later that year, terminating her contract.

In completing Summer Stock, Garland was fortunate to have the support of her friends, including studio head Louis B. Mayer (who kept her in the role despite the troubles she presented) and her male lead, Gene Kelly. The film marks the third and final onscreen pairing for Garland and Kelly; the two first appeared together in Kelly’s screen debut, 1942′s For Me and My Gal, and then co-starred in The Pirate six years later. By most accounts, Garland and Kelly got on well; according to Garland biographer John Fricke, Kelly (who remained grateful for the help seasoned film actress Garland gave him on the set of Gal) agreed to do the film primarily as a favor to the actress, and in the process brought his own touch to the production. Though Nick Castle was credited as the dance director for the film, some of the best numbers from the film (notably “You, Wonderful You” and its reprises) were very obviously choreographed by Kelly.

You, Wonderful You” is the cornerstone musical piece of the film, marking the evolution of the love story between Jane and Joe. Its initial appearance in the film occurs as Jane first begins to open up to Joe, and its staging is quite similar to “You Were Meant for Me” in Singin’ in the Rain (1952)–the two characters on an empty stage, lit by soft spotlights as the male lead sings of his love, before segueing into a delicate pas de deux. It’s lovemaking, set to music–beautiful, heartfelt, emotional–and Kelly’s relatively soft, romantic performance here is nothing short of mesmerizing (let’s face facts: the man’s a veritable dreamboat).

Kelly revisits “You, Wonderful You” (sans lyrics) in the famous “newspaper number,” a dance that demonstrates the full depths of the actor’s charm. Accompanied at first only by the squeak of a floorboard, the scratch of a newspaper on the floor, his own tapping shoes, and an intermittent whistling reprise of the tune, Kelly constructs an intricate solo ballet.

Initially, he makes his own music through the motions of his body and the instrumentation of his props, but as Kelly gives himself full over to the sheer joy of movement, the orchestra creeps in, rising into a crescendo of sound that mimics the increasingly frenetic pacing of the dance. This number perfectly captures Kelly’s innate understanding of the importance of lighting and staging in conveying the meaning of the dance to the audience; when Kelly jumps atop a stack of boxes and dances alongside his shadow cast on the nearby wall, the lovely contrast between light and dark, man and shadow, reflects Kelly’s inner turmoil over his growing feelings for Jane (in this way, it could be said that Kelly’s dance with the newspaper is at least somewhat reminiscent of his dance with his own reflection in 1944′s Cover Girl).

The other memorable number from Summer Stock (one which was not designed by either Kelly or Castle, but instead by the film’s director, Charles Walters), “Get Happy,” had been added to the film three months after shooting was completed, as a showpiece for a magically slimmed-down Garland. And yes, though it’s been harped on repeatedly over the years, one must admit that the actress’ appearance in this scene is a little jarring, considering she was noticeably heavier in her previous (and subsequent) scenes. Still, Garland’s performance in “Get Happy” has become legendary in its own right, and marks one of the best musical numbers of her career (which is saying something, considering how many iconic moments she has given us).

Admittedly, Summer Stock is largely a Judy Garland vehicle–it was designed that way, after all, as a kind of comeback after a couple of trying years for the actress. But Kelly’s contributions are equally important–if not more so–to the film’s success. Had Garland’s original intended co-star in the film, Mickey Rooney, played the part of Joe, we might not now remember this movie as one of the great classic musicals. It took the extra-special touch of Gene Kelly’s brilliant, bold choreography (not to mention his delightfully cheeky grin and … other endowments) and that sparkling chemistry with Garland to make Summer Stock the wholly entertaining film that it remains to this day.

 

This post is an entry in the Gene Kelly Centennial Blogathon, hosted by the Classic Movie Blog Association. Visit the CMBA site for a full list of participants.

Katharine Hepburn is Awesome

Today, Summer Under the Stars on TCM features Katharine Hepburn–all day, all night, hooray! It would be wise to set your DVR to record the entire day or, better yet, just cancel any plans you may have. Get some snacks and a blanket and just get comfortable in front of the television.

ADAM’S RIB (1949)

It’s no mystery to regular readers of this blog how much I love Katharine Hepburn. She’s my hero. Her skill, her demeanor on screen, and her indomitable energy made her famous for generations. It’s only fitting that she is honored with a Summer Under the Stars tribute day.  More information than I could ever compile on the actress’ life and storied career is available and aesthetically presented on TCM’s fabulous Hepburn SUTS page.

MARY OF SCOTLAND (1936)

The lineup begins with Christopher Strong at 6AM EST, one of three films today from 1933.  The movies on the schedule run from 1933 to 1969. The schedule includes two of my favorites: Adam’s Rib (1949) and Woman of the Year (1942). I see that Brandie’s favorite, Bringing Up Baby (1938), comes on at 12:15AM EST; I’m sure she’ll be watching. The lineup further includes important films such as Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner (1967); 1933′s Little Women (which I really like, even though I didn’t care for the novel–I find this version to be the best, but I’m perhaps biased); and her shining performance as Mary Stewart in 1936′s Mary of Scotland (we’ll forgive the fact that it’s a depressing story).

BRINGING UP BABY (1938)

Renowned for her sharp wit and intelligence, Katharine Hepburn was an uncommon starlet. Her legacy endured through several eras of film and numerous changes in the nation with class and spirit.  Her charming performances in romantic comedies belied her excellent capabilities as a dramatic actress. I’ve discussed her eerie and complex performance in Suddenly, Last Summer (1959) in a previous post, and I believe it is worth comparing that film to those on the list today. In that movie, she’s elegant and regal, while being subtle and completely terrifying. The more you pay attention, the more terrifying she is. Phenomenal.

SUDDENLY, LAST SUMMER (1959)

Frankly, I was surprised not to see The Philadelphia Story (1940) on the list today, but perhaps the schedulers at TCM thought it too obvious. Still, I felt it worth mentioning here, as the role was written for her, and it is one of the most popular of her films. As much as I love the 1956 musical remake High Society, even Grace Kelly could not bring the same spirit to her character that Katharine Hepburn did. The entire film has a different tone and feeling.

So, enjoy today, all day. You’re assured first-rate performances in comedy and drama. Thank you to Katharine Hepburn and the producers of Summer Under the Stars on TCM for indulging our love of this always wonderful actress!

 

This post is an entry in the “2012 TCM SUTS Blogathon” hosted by Sittin’ on a Backyard Fence and ScribeHard on Film. More Kate-centric posts can be found on their sites throughout the day!

He’d ne’er leave the girl with the strawberry curls.

Biff Grimes (James Cagney) is an ex-con living in turn-of-the-century New York City who has not found much success in his post-prison career as a dentist. One Sunday afternoon, while preparing to go for a walk with his wife, Amy (Olivia de Havilland), Biff gets a call from the president of the local bank: one of his guests, Alderman Hugo Barnstead (Jack Carson) needs a tooth pulled. Biff immediately recognizes Barnstead’s name as the man whose schemes put Biff in prison, and as he plots his revenge, the film flashes back a decade to reveal their shared history.

In the past, Biff and Hugo are longtime friends–Biff takes correspondence courses to become a dentist, while Hugo has various shady business dealings that keep him flush. One day, Hugo and Biff encounter a beautiful strawberry blonde, Virginia (Rita Hayworth), and Hugo pursues her while Biff watches resignedly. Hugo and Virginia make plans to “accidentally” encounter one another at the park that evening, and when Virginia says she is bringing along a friend, Amy, Hugo tricks Biff into going along on the double date. Though Hugo gives his “word of honor” that he will let Biff “have” Virginia, he goes back on his word and sticks Biff with Amy, a suffragette whose brash behavior and beliefs about women’s equality horrify Biff.

Biff and Hugo invite the girls to go on a boat ride and picnic, but the boat has been oversold and Biff and Virginia cannot get on the boat. The two of them spend the day together, doing an entire, expensive itinerary of things that Virginia wants to do–a visit to the zoo, dinner, dancing, a carriage ride. Biff adores Virginia and begs for another date, but finding that she is a very popular companion, he can only get her to commit to a date three weeks later. But on the day of their date, Amy shows up instead, and Biff learns that Hugo and Virginia had eloped that afternoon.

The film flashes forward a couple of years–Amy and Biff are married, and Biff is one month away from completing his dental studies. Biff runs into Virginia on the street, and when he reveals that he and Amy are married, Virginia invites them to dinner the following night. Virginia and Hugo are unhappily married, sniping at one another, and Hugo’s irritated at Virginia’s continued interest in Biff. When she urges him to give Biff a job at his contracting firm, Hugo agrees that his “non-too-bright” friend would make a good vice president for his firm. But six months later, Biff has done nothing but sign papers, and it soon becomes clear that Hugo has set him up to take the fall for his misdeeds–when a building collapses (killing Biff’s father in the process), it is revealed that Hugo has been using sub-par materials, and Biff is left holding the bag. He asks Amy to wait for him as he’s arrested and sentenced to five years in prison. In the meantime, he finishes his dental correspondence course and earns his diploma–setting up the film’s return to the “present,” as Biff finally gets the chance for vengeance …

Thanks to the combined efforts of director Raoul Walsh, production designer Robert Haas, cinematographer James Wong Howe, Heinz Roemheld’s score (utilizing popular tunes from the era), the lavish costumes of Orry-Kelly–hell, the whole damn cast and crew–The Strawberry Blonde (1941) lovingly recreates late 19th/early 20th century New York City. It’s a charming and nostalgic film, wistfully remembering a time that seems so long ago–even though the film was made only a few decades after its setting, it might as well be a different world altogether. Blonde is a hard film to classify: not entirely dramatic, not entirely comedic, sprinkled with music, with a bit of dirty dealings thrown in for good measure. And yet the competing genres at work here ultimately blend together seamlessly, due in large part to a well-crafted script from screenwriting siblings Julius and Philip Epstein (the Oscar-winning pair responsible for memorable classics such as 1942′s Casablanca, among many, many others). The Epsteins based the screenplay on James Hagan’s 1933 Broadway play One Sunday Afternoon, which had previously been adapted as the 1933 pre-Code film of the same name. This version, with Gary Cooper in the Cagney role and Fay Wray as Virginia, was an utter disaster at the box office. Knowing this, Cagney was initially reluctant to star in Walsh’s remake, but when the Epsteins reworked the story, deliberately tailoring the script to Cagney’s strengths, the actor eventually came on board.

Biff is a hot-headed Irish banty rooster, quick to throw up his fists and unwilling to back down from a fight. He’s also a horrible combatant who ends up with more black eyes than victories. The character is a definite “type,” but Cagney imbues Biff with enough humor and heart to offset the stereotype–he doesn’t fight simply for the sake of fighting, but generally enters confrontations in defense of someone or something (his father, Virginia’s honor). Biff is not a “violent” character–Cagney portrays him as rash and impulse-driven, but heartfelt in his intentions. And even though he ends up in the worst of circumstances–taken advantage of by his former pal, inadvertently losing his father to Hugo’s machinations–Biff is never a figure of pity; the audience has no doubt that he will overcome his heartbreak and troubles in the end.

For all that Cagney is the main focus of The Strawberry Blonde, de Havilland gets the meatier role. As the unapologetic suffragette and crusader for women’s rights, de Havilland is the source of some of the best moments of the film. Amy talks a big game about being a “loose” woman, but when Biff calls her bluff, she is terrified and bursts into tears. She’s a steadying force, anchoring Biff and providing an unobtrusively moral center for the action. At the same time, Amy’s the most entertaining character of the bunch. One of the highlights of the movie is the laugh-out-loud double-date scene–Amy and Biff, stuck together while Hugo and Virginia engage in a clutch, reluctantly engage in conversation, and Amy proceeds to shock Biff by claiming that a woman doesn’t need marriage to enjoy the benefits of a home and children. De Havilland’s body language speaks louder than her dialogue here–she stands nonchalantly, hands behind her back and swaying forwards and back as she speaks, finishing her offhanded diatribe with a wink that has an outraged Cagney reeling back as if she’s struck him. It’s a moment of sheer, hilarious brilliance that really demonstrates de Havilland’s sometimes underrated comedic ability.

The two female leads are modeled as foils for one another, with Amy’s directness bothering Virginia just as much as Virginia’s hypocrisy bothers Amy (though, admittedly, Amy is just as much a hypocrite in her own way). Virginia insists upon maintaining the facade of respectability, excusing her behavior through niceties. And though Virginia looks upon Amy’s forthrightness as “unseemly,” Amy is the more “virtuous” of the two by far. That virtue, however, does not make Amy an unbearable character (as so many virtuous onscreen ladies are); she is a fascinatingly deep character, in stark contrast to Virginia’s shallow nature.

While de Havilland is undoubtedly given more to do in the film, Hayworth’s only job, it seems, is to look pretty and act enticing–not what you might call a “difficult” task for the starlet, at least based on her screen persona. Hayworth is the title character, and yet at this still relatively early stage in her career, she was third-billed behind Cagney and de Havilland. Though Hayworth had been appearing in films for more than a decade–first under her birth name, Rita Cansino, and then under her new “non-ethnic” moniker–she had never really broken through as a full-fledged star. A supporting role in 1939′s Only Angels Have Wings gave Hayworth’s career a boost, but it wasn’t until Columbia loaned her to Warner Bros. for The Strawberry Blonde (after the studio’s own Ann Sheridan refused to star) that Hayworth finally “arrived.” Audiences and critics alike were enamored with Hayworth in this film, with Variety labeling her “an eyeful,” and notoriously fussy New York Times critic Bosley Crowther, who lauded the film as “lusty, affectionate, and altogether winning,” singled out Hayworth’s turn as the “classic ‘flirt’” for a mention.

Still, there is more to Virginia than just being the flirt. It takes brains and talent to convincingly portray vapidness without delving into caricature, and Hayworth is more than up to the task. Virginia has some of the most cringe-worthy lines in the film–for instance, when Amy tries to talk to her about gender equality, Virginia sticks her nose in the air and snaps, “I refuse to listen to advanced ideas.” But there is no mistaking Hayworth’s ability in presenting Virginia, whose behavior easily invites the audience’s dislike, as an appealing (if ultimately unsympathetic) character.

The movie is helped greatly by a talented supporting cast featuring some very familiar faces. Jack Carson is slimy perfection as the devious Hugo. For someone used to Carson’s more genial comedic roles (generally opposite buddy Dennis Morgan, who, interestingly enough, would later star in yet another remake of this story directed by Walsh, 1948′s One Sunday Afternoon), his turn here might seem disconcerting. But one need only look at Carson’s performance in Mildred Pierce (1945) to see that playing the schemer was not entirely out of his wheelhouse. Character actor George Tobias pops up in yet another stereotypical Greek role as Biff’s buddy, Nick; Blonde marks the second of several films in which Tobias would co-star with Cagney (after 1940′s Torrid Zone). Other notable supporting roles are filled by Alan Hale as Biff’s drunken father; future Superman George Reeves as a belligerent college boy who raises Biff’s ire in the “present-day” scenes; and the ever-delightful Una O’Connor as the sharp-tongued neighborhood busybody, Mrs. Mulcahey.

The Strawberry Blonde may not be as well-known as other films featuring its three big names, but it is enjoyable nonetheless, filled with charm and humor, strong performances, and a truly entertaining story. It is, in a simple word, delightful.

 

This post is an entry in the 2012 TCM SUTS Blogathon hosted by Sittin’ on a Backyard Fence and ScribeHard on Film. For more information and to view other entries throughout the month, check out their sites or follow the blogathon on Twitter

The Strawberry Blonde airs this afternoon at 6PM EST on TCM.

“I teach you truths. My truths.”

To Sir, with Love (1967) is probably my favorite Sidney Poitier movie. What’s not to love about Sidney Poitier? He’s credited with opening up the world of film for African-Americans by expanding the nature of their roles. Of all of his memorable characters, Mr. Thackeray is my favorite. He steps in as an instructor at an underprivileged school where the teachers have given up on the students. But instead of joining his colleagues in their hopelessness, he raises the standards for the students and teaches them anything they wish to know.

This plot has been used again and again, but we like moviegoers generally seem to like it. To Sir, with Love could be considered a precursor to a sub-genre of films such as Stand and Deliver (1988), Dead Poets Society (1989), and The Emperor’s Club (2002). Interestingly, the year after Sir was released, the similarly-themed The Prime of Miss Jean Brodie (1969), starring Dame Maggie Smith, premiered. Contrary to Poitier’s inspirational Mr. Thackeray, however, Miss Brodie truly becomes a manipulator for her own political and career gain–though each teacher’s special attentions and influences in shaping the minds of youth are somewhat similar.

Sidney Poitier was the perfect actor for this role. His tone, posture, diction, and manner draw in the audience the way he would his students. The film is excellent, the script well-written, and the premise inspiring. Sir insists that hope helps people achieve potential and that we rise to the standards expected of us. Mr. Thackeray begins by commanding respect and returning it. From there, he engages the students by teaching them honestly and openly. His success with his students–and their resulting gratitude–strengthens his resolve and dedication to return and continue turning around the lives of the city youth.

The film also features Lulu as “Babs”–my other favorite character in the film. Lulu was a popular British musician in the 1960s and performs the famous title song, “To Sir, with Love,” in the film. Lulu is still around and has performed in various films and television series, almost always in a musical role.

Poitier performed in the film with many other popular British actors of the time, such as Christian Roberts, Judy Geeson, and Suzy Kendall. As Poitier was from Miami (via Bahamian parents), he was a transplant in England as a performer, and a transplant in the world of the film, too. He brought his quiet, revolutionary performance style to his quietly revolutionary character.

 

Sidney Poitier gives a brilliant performance in this film. He is engaging: formal, yet straightforward, and honest as only Poitier can be. He makes it easy for the audience to align with him, and he leaves us feeling enlightened and hopeful by the end.

Today, August 7th, TCM’s annual Summer Under the Stars event features twenty-four hours of films from Sidney Poitier. I can wholeheartedly recommend all of the films on the schedule; no doubt, it will be a great day filled with shining performances. But if you can only see one movie today, make it To Sir, with Love.

 

This post is an entry in the “TCM SUTS 2012 Blogathon” hosted by Sittin’ on a Backyard Fence and ScribeHard on Film. You can read all of the entries about Sidney Poitier as they are posted throughout the day. Make sure to check in with Jill and Michael every day this month for more SUTS fun!

To Sir, with Love airs on TCM tonight at 10:15PM EST.

Getting to know Marilyn Monroe.

 

The legendary blonde bombshell, Marilyn Monroe, has for some time been a mystery to me. The handful of movies that I’ve seen of hers have left me unimpressed. While unarguably beautiful, she always seems to play an unintelligent, gold-digger type, which is unappealing to me (personally, I’ve always been more of a Katharine Hepburn fan: I like a strong, independent female lead). However, while researching more about the mysterious Monroe, I’ve learned that she may have been much deeper than she seemed on the surface. Monroe had a troubled childhood; her father abandoned the family, and her mother was mentally ill. She grew up in foster homes, and was said to have been abused and nearly raped at the age of six. Surely she was more intelligent than the characters she portrayed, as she took literature courses at UCLA and was said to have been well-read (from a literature teacher’s mindset, this is an obvious sign of intelligence). So why did Monroe continue to play the role of the sex symbol, the bubble-headed blonde, seemingly without fail?

Two of Monroe’s early screen performances set the stage for the persona that would ultimately define her career. In the humorous 1952 film We’re Not Married!, five couples discover that their marriages are not legal. Two years after ceremonies conducted by a senile judge were performed, the couples are informed by letters that their marriages are not official. The elderly judge is reprimanded; apparently, he was not officially in office until January 15, but he still married five couples between December 24 – January 14. Because he was not officially a judge when he performed those ceremonies, the couples involved were not legally wed. One such couple is Mr. and Mrs. Norris (David Wayne and Monroe).

When the judge and his wife recall the couple, the judge can’t stop talking about how cute the young woman, Mrs. Norris, had been: “Wasn’t she cute? Remember how she blushed about everything?” The husband, on the other hand, was remembered as a “jerk.” When we meet the couple, we see that things have changed for them: while the Mrs. is away competing in beauty contests, her husband is at home cooking, cleaning, and taking care of their infant.

Her husband is obviously very frustrated with this arrangement. When he answers the door in an apron, the postman says, “Where’s Mrs. Norris? At the office?” When Mr. Norris opens the letter that explains the couple is not legally married, he is thrilled. He immediately wires the Mrs. Mississippi committee to have her stripped of her title, since technically she is no longer a “Mrs.” He believes that this will allow him to share more of the domestic duties with her. Unfortunately for him, when he tells her the news, she is ecstatic. This means that she can compete in the “Miss Mississippi” contest instead of the “Mrs. Mississippi” contest that she’s previously been a part of.

“We’re not married!”

This is one of the few films in which I’ve seen Marilyn playing a married woman with a child. Although she is a beauty queen, she does not play the sex kitten that she has in the majority of her other films that I’ve seen. Also, although she is rather selfish and neglectful of her family, she is not the ditsy blonde that I’ve come to know as “Marilyn Monroe.” Instead, she is an ambitious woman who seems to work hard to reach her goal, which, for once, is not to bag a rich man.

Marilyn has another small part in the 1952 film Monkey Business starring Cary Grant and Ginger Rogers.

In this film, Dr. Fulton (Grant) attempts to create a fountain-of-youth drug. Thanks to a lab monkey, he is fairly successful. When he drinks the “miracle juice,” he begins to act like a young man. He goes out and purchases a new suit and a flashy sports car. Although he is married to the loyal Mrs. Fulton (Rogers), he spends time with a secretary who works at his company, Miss Laurel (Monroe). She seems to believe that he is romantically interested in her, and does her best to catch his attentions.

They spend the day together driving around in his sports car, roller-skating, and swimming at the community pool. After the drug wears off, he is no longer interested in the young, air-headed secretary. One of the most enjoyable parts of the film was watching Rogers threaten Monroe to stay away from her husband: “I’ll pull that blonde hair out by its black roots! … Put ‘em up! Put ‘em up! Put ‘em up!”

Although she fit the bill, I found Monroe’s character to be, once again, static. This is another Monroe film in which she plays a beautiful, yet ignorant blonde. She seemed to be the exact same character that she played in some of her other films, such as The Seven Year Itch (1955), Some Like It Hot (1959), and Gentlemen Prefer Blondes (1953). Her performance in Bus Stop (1956) was slightly better, although she still plays a naive pushover who can’t seem to take control of the situation in which she becomes involved.

After reading her biographical information, I really want to become a Monroe fan, but I’m stymied by that overwhelmingly dizzy persona. In the relatively few films of hers that I have seen, Monroe just seems either unwilling or incapable of rising above the tired blonde stereotype. Was it fear? A sign of her inability/inexperience as an actress? Pressure from the studios? Or was she just more comfortable letting people see the facade as opposed to the “real thing?”

I’m convinced that there must more to her than meets the eye. Monroe fans, speak up! Are there Monroe performances out there that prove this? Can you help point this Monroe newbie in the right direction to find some performances that reflect the more cerebral, “real life” Marilyn?

 

This post is an entry in the “2012 TCM SUTS Blogathon” hosted by Sittin’ on a Backyard Fence and ScribeHard on Film. Check out the other Marilyn-centric posts that will be submitted throughout the day, and be sure to catch 24 hours of Monroe’s films all day on TCM.

Living the American dream with Mr. Blandings.

“It’s a conspiracy, I tell you. The minute you start, they put you on the all-American sucker list. You start out to build a home and wind up in the poorhouse. And if it can happen to me, what about the guys who aren’t making $15,000 a year? The ones who want a home of their own. It’s a conspiracy, I tell you–against every boy and girl who were ever in love.”

In the wake of World War II, the great migration from cities to suburbs began in earnest as weary urban dwellers sought to escape the rigors of overcrowding and increasing rent in favor of owning their own homes. Mortgages were affordable and relatively easy to obtain–particularly for veterans–and in the decade following the war, the rate of home ownership in the United States increased by more than twenty percent. More than ever, owning a home was considered an integral part of the American dream, and it was the goal of many an American middle-class household.

Of course, the dream and the reality are often in stark contrast to one another, and many new homeowners were unprepared for the issues–monetary, physical, psychological–associated with holding full responsibility for one’s domicile. This quickly-dashed idealism is the center of Mr. Blandings Builds His Dream House (1948), which not only gives us a comedic look at the problems associated with building one’s own “nest,” but also gently satirizes the supposed idylls of home ownership.

Cary Grant stars as the titular Mr. Jim Blandings, an advertising man who lives with his wife, Muriel (Myrna Loy) and their two daughters, Betsy (Connie Marshall) and Joan (Sharyn Moffett) in a tiny New York apartment. Tired of living in such cramped quarters (and discovering that his wife has been talking to an expensive interior designer on the sly), Jim decides–almost on a whim–to move the family to the country (i.e. Connecticut). Jim and Muriel get suckered into buying a dilapidated old farm house for more than its worth, only to later be informed by their friend and lawyer, Bill Cole (Melvyn Douglas), that they have been bamboozled. But the Blandings have fallen in love with the idea of the place and proceed with the deal, against any and all advice.

As it turns out, the house is unsound and must be demolished and rebuilt from the ground up. The Blandings hire Henry Sims (Reginald Denny), an architect, to design a new home, and construction proceeds. But there are problems from the get-go, from incompetent workmen to issues with the land–not to mention the ever-increasing costs of the project. Compounded with problems at work and his growing jealousy over the “relationship” between his wife and his best friend, Jim finds his life quickly spiraling out of control. Can he survive the building of his dream home with his family, job, and sanity intact?

The opening scenes of the film–laid over Douglas’ wry narration–underscore the central conflict of the film between the bustling city and the calmer country. Bill Cole’s voice-over describes the city in flattering, incongruous terms (a crowded lunch counter becomes a “quaint little sidewalk cafe”) that humorously set up the difference between the current locale and the more rural one to come. For its part, Manhattan is a claustrophobic wonderland, overflowing with millions of people, pushing, shoving, struggling just to move through the streets. That conflict is recreated in miniature inside the cramped Blandings apartment: Jim’s search through the minuscule bedroom closet for his robe; fighting with his daughters for access to the bathroom; maneuvering around Muriel to catch a glimpse of himself in the mirror while shaving (or resignedly wiping the steam from the mirror while she showers); inching around close-set tables and furniture in a long-established, intricate ballet of restricted movement.

And yet the solution to these problems–the spacious countryside, the big house with two closets and a bathroom for every member of the family (aren’t they living in a dream world?)–is not quite the idyllic conclusion the Blandings expected. The people in the supposedly more “civilized” country are potentially just as crooked as their city-folk counterparts (the shady real estate agent being a prime example), and the problems of overcrowding are replaced by the mounting expenses and inconveniences of living so far outside of the city. Though the movie ultimately finds its happy ending, with the Blandings comfortably ensconced in their new “dream home,” the costs of getting there, it seems, are discouraging and troublesome.

Grant and Loy starred in three films together, and Mr. Blandings marks the last of these. In many ways, it is also their best. As a domestic couple, they are a charming pair, beautiful, witty, and appealing. Grant is such a “dad”–he wanders around the apartment, seemingly in every female’s way, weighing himself on the bathroom scale with a rueful pat of his (nonexistent) gut and singing off-key in the shower. He’s not even able to enjoy bathroom time to himself in the morning without Muriel coming in. Still, Jim–at least initially–is unfazed by the seeming disorder and chaos that mark his domestic life; he simply sighs and squeezes the tube of toothpaste back into proper form without a word, like any beleaguered father (his performance, especially in the opening scenes, bring a myriad of hapless paternal figures from any number of sitcoms to mind).

While Grant’s befuddled and increasingly frustrated Jim is undeniably the centerpiece of the film, Loy more than matches him quip for quip. Muriel is determined to have the house of her dreams, and spends most of her time concerned about the color schemes and decorative elements of the house than her husband’s growing irritation at the ever-ballooning budget, leading to priceless exchanges like this one:

Muriel: “I refuse to endanger the lives of my children in a house with less than four bathrooms.”
Jim: “For thirteen hundred dollars, they can live in a house with three bathrooms and rough it.”

Loy doesn’t look old enough to have teenage daughters in this film, even though in reality she was forty-three when it was released. The  movie came in the wake of a four-year break from Hollywood that Loy had taken during the war, when she allied herself with the Red Cross and undertook several tours to sell war bonds and raise money for the military effort. When she finally returned to the screen, she found perhaps her greatest role starring opposite Fredric March in the phenomenal post-war drama The Best Years of Our Lives (1946). The subsequent years had found her as successful as ever, with the release of the final Thin Man movie, Song of the Thin Man (1947), and her second pairing with Grant, as Shirley Temple’s older sister in The Bachelor and the Bobby-Soxer (1947), both cleaning up at the box office. The late 40s marked the peak of her career, however, as she took on fewer film roles in the following decades.

A warm and genuinely funny comedy marked by excellent performances from its lead trio (not to mention great supporting turns from Denny and Louise Beavers as the family maid, Gussie), Mr. Blandings Builds His Dream House is simply a must-see.

 

This post is an entry in the “2012 TCM SUTS Blogathon” hosted by Sittin’ on a Backyard Fence and ScribeHard on Film. Make sure to check out all of the Myrna Loy-centric entries from today, and more stars throughout the month!

Mr. Blandings Builds His Dream House airs at 6PM EST today on TCM.

John Wayne is … McLintock!

The movie poster, though I can’t say I like the imagery or the color …

McLintock! (1963) is my favorite John Wayne movie. Not being a big fan of Westerns in general, this hardly may be great praise, but perhaps it is. It is on my short list of “westerns worth watching.” I love the humor, the banter, and the playfulness of this movie.

My grandmother loved Westerns, and she loved John Wayne. She would have been ninety years old this past July, and that is a big part of why I volunteered to do this piece.

John Wayne as G.W. McLintock

John Wayne made a career out of being the cowboy, the “man’s man” on the silver screen–and why not? He was huge. He’s impressive on screen and was fairly impressive in person. (There is a statue of him in Madame Tussaud’s in London–or at least there was several years ago–and you can see for yourself.) He was also known not to be shy about his opinions, which pretty  much reflects his on-screen characters. McLintock! was indeed a comedy, but also an expression of his own conservative views.

McLintock’s justice–afterwards, we see the mud brawl.

He was responsible for naming the Governor (Robert Lowery) Cuthbert H. Humphrey after his own political thorn, Senator Humphrey.  The anti-feminism within the plot feels forgivable, probably due to the film’s unabashed childishness–spankings, fighting in mud, resisting decorum. More than anything, we watch John Wayne act like a very large, intoxicated child. His escapades are so well-known that the local children race to catch his hat in the morning (which he has thrown to the weather vane atop the roof in his drunken return home). To make matters more interesting, Maureen O’Hara plays opposite him as his estranged wife Katherine, all the while informing him he should act like a grown man, instead of an ape. If anyone could play this role, it was Maureen O’Hara.

Even Maureen O’Hara’s in the mud.

In McLintock!, Wayne reunites with O’Hara once more (in the fourth of their five films together), with appearances by Patrick Wayne, Stefanie Powers, Chill Wills (Best. Name. Ever.), and a goofball performance by Jerry Van Dyke. The only really sentimental part goes to character actor Jack Kruschen as Mr. Birnbaum. They made a good choice in casting him; he made short roles go far in film and television throughout his career (it appears broadcast television had to reconfigure itself to do without him after his retirement in the late nineties, as he was in countless major series for more than forty years).

What I love about this film is that it’s quotable, such as during the famous mud scene when the Chief declares, “Great party, but no whiskey. We go home.”  He’s a great character, rather Sondheim in nature, with his random appearances regarding whiskey. Then it flips and they are crucial to the development of the plot, or subplot, depending on which plot you consider primary. Regardless, he’s an excellent addition to the film and helps set the unique tone for this Western piece.

My favorite piece of John Wayne timing is the fight with Maureen O’Hara. After said fight, in which she refuses to have a discussion with “an intoxicated man” and storms up the stairs, he follows her, stating, “And I am not intoxicated. Yet.”  This scene sums up the film and their relationship in a few lines of spot-on timing.

Mrs. McLintock vs. Mrs. Warren–I do love Mrs. Warren.

This film is fun and lighthearted. It’s the type of film that makes you think they had fun making it, or at least hope they did. As I enjoy assigning accompanying foods to movie-watching, I particularly recommend partnering McLintock! with biscuits, in deference to Mrs. Warren’s cooking prowess, and perhaps a fried chicken dinner with mashed potatoes.

 

This post is an entry in the “2012 TCM Summer Under the Stars” Blogathon sponsored by Jill of Sittin’ on a Backyard Fence and Michael of ScribeHard on Film. Make sure to check in with Jill and Michael throughout the month for more entries from around the blogosphere!

McLintock! airs at 5:45PM EST today on TCM.

Blogathons, baby, blogathons!

Blogathons, blogathons, blogathons! It seems like every classic movie blog on the web is hosting one in the next couple of months. And that is not a complaint–it’s fantastic to see the interest in classic films that such blogathons tend to generate and promote among movie fans. We told you about several upcoming events in our beginning-of-the-month announcements post, but two new blogathons have been added to the roster, and considering that one of them kicks off on August 1st, we want to help get the word out as soon as possible …

First up, two of our favorite bloggers (and prolific tweeters), “BiscuitKittenJill and “ScribeHardMichael, are co-hosting a month-long blogathon to coincide with TCM”s annual Summer Under the Stars celebration. I’ll allow them to explain the premise behind this event:

“[Check out the] TCM Summer Under the Stars schedule for its entire 2012 run. Pick a movie … pick a star … pick a whole day … pick five … ten … whatever! This is a month-long blogathon and we want to showcase as many bloggers as many times as we can. And because your picks will coincide with their respective SUTS days, you can plan as far in advance as you need to.

Whether your medium is the written word, stories in pictures, video tributes, or even a simple haiku (see what Michael did there?), we want you to make the great Summer Under the Stars event even greater.”

As SUTS is one of our favorite times of the year here at True Classics, you know we are all over this one. All four of us will be posting something for this event (and some of us *coughBrandiecough* will be posting multiple somethings throughout the month).

There are a number of banners to choose from so you can publicize this event on your own site (including the one posted above with the front-and-center shot of Gene Kelly’s delectable ass–thanks, Jill and Michael!). You can find out more information on the blogathon’s Facebook page, and you can also follow the tcmSUTSblogathon feed on Twitter.

 

In September, three great bloggers/Twitter pals, Kellee (@IrishJayhawk66), Aurora (@CitizenScreen), and Paula (@Paula_Guthat), are co-hosting a celebration of character actors–those indelible supporting players who populate some of our favorite films. As they explain:

“[We] are dedicating an event to the great character actors that so enhanced our classic movies. To the faces, the laughs, the drama presented by these wonderful actors whose names all too often go unrecognized we dedicate WHAT A CHARACTER!

  • Would Casablanca be as great without the laughs provided by S. K. Sakall?
  • Would we want to look out Rear Window if not for the warnings of Thelma Ritter?
  • Can you measure how much Edward Everett Horton added to the fabulous Astaire/Rogers pictures?

We think these and so many others deserve their due. So, here we are with a blogathon in their honor.”

You can sign up any time between now and the time of the blogathon–just contact Kellee, Aurora, and/or Paula and let them know which character actor you would like to focus on! (But you can’t have Mary Wickes–she’s ours!)

These blogathons promise to present some great reading–are you signed up to participate in either one yet?